Brave Hearted Warriors

IP address

Web Traffic

Log in

I forgot my password

Poll

i love laming.......
58% 58% [ 38 ]
23% 23% [ 15 ]
18% 18% [ 12 ]

Total Votes : 65

Latest topics

» no daG spam no drg LOS hack.. boring site now
Fri Feb 24, 2017 6:56 pm by daG

» Time to get some activity back
Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:15 pm by CSK_Suhas

» happyyy... b'dayyy bluewolf
Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:12 pm by CSK_Suhas

» Happy birthday Dag
Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:12 pm by CSK_Suhas

» Counter Strike ?
Fri Aug 03, 2012 10:49 pm by daG

» Wanna Join
Fri Aug 03, 2012 10:46 pm by daG

» CsK is Silver.. :D
Fri Aug 03, 2012 10:44 pm by daG

» Update Me with Indian Clan
Mon Jul 09, 2012 11:40 am by _CsK_ImDrG_

» gb guys..
Wed Jul 06, 2011 3:50 am by daG


    Good post from CSA member when reviewing RTSL game Vs RoR

    Share
    avatar
    CSA_J_Conner
    Paladin
    Paladin

    Posts : 893
    Join date : 2008-11-22

    Good post from CSA member when reviewing RTSL game Vs RoR

    Post by CSA_J_Conner on Tue May 12, 2009 7:21 pm

    CA in pocket is 15xx strategy. Forward the enemy pocket is 14xx strategy. I've never lost to an enemy pocket rush when I've been pocket. It's a late rush, a good scouter will see it coming. By the time you get to his base he is already up to Castle. A few walls and sometimes a tower will stop it like happened in this game.

    I've been playing more competitive games lately and I have to say that 2 stables is overrated in most cases. Or actually, it's because 1 stable is so much more efficient militarywise and economywise. It takes skill to pull it off at higher levels, but it can be done. Two stables is a niche strategy - when one of your teammates has a good civ advantage (like Huns vs. Mongols) then you can use it for aggression and sometimes their map is so open that they'll need help. If you're playing a random team game with 1700+ in MS or UA then 2 stables is safe because your teammates could be unpredictable. But when it's your clanmates I say it's better to have one stable with knights used effectively than 2 stables that are just a meat shield for a dumb teammate who's playing too aggressively. If the flank loses his army it's because either. A. he didn't make enough army to start with B. he got caught in the open C. he just sucks

    A good flank shouldn't need help from the pocket unless his map is absolutely garbage or he's getting sieged very early. The winning strategy on flank is to play defense - make archers, raid when it's safe, palisade key points, upgrade archers to x-bow in Castle Age, switch to knights, raid multiple spots with x-bows and knights, minimize your own army casualties, boom from 3 or 4 TC's while pumping army, go Imp, play Imp. It's boring but it works.

    In a league game on Arabia a flank has to up with pop 22 or less. A pocket should Feudal with 27 pop, hit Castle with 29 or 30 pop minus spears. Any higher than this and you're a liability to the team. A pocket can get hit with archers or scouts early, the sooner you get to Castle the better. All flanks should go archers except for Mongols who should almost always go scouts, and Huns can do scouts when deer in Dark age or on a good map. The pocket should always make knights, never CA. Never forward. God forbid he does a forward with scouts Razz The pocket needs a fast, versatile, all-purpose unit, that's what the knight is. CA can kill vils and pikemen... useless. Knights can kill anything that's not a pikeman or a camel and they'll kill those if you have larger numbers.

    Also, aimed at nobody in particular: since I started playing I've always heard the "I played bad" excuse. To that I say, "Yeah, you did play bad, and it's because you were never all that good." If you're drunk or tired then it's valid, or even if you've just come back from a long time away from the game. But if a few games before you just beat somebody pretty well and all of the sudden you just happened to "play bad" then you're kidding yourself. The reason you played bad is because there's a fundamental misunderstanding or lack of knowledge somewhere. I've seen really good players play when they're rusty and they may have an occasional bad start but not the horrific starts that 1900- players seem to have. When I say that I play bad it's because I don't know a map, forgot a strategy, or something along those lines. I rarely mess up with scouting, luring boars, army micro, etc. Mouse/keyboard speed has to be re-conditioned but if you say you played bad because you played slow then you were not recently in shape.
    avatar
    _CsK_Bluewolf
    Paladin
    Paladin

    Posts : 827
    Join date : 2008-11-04
    Age : 28
    Location : chennai

    Re: Good post from CSA member when reviewing RTSL game Vs RoR

    Post by _CsK_Bluewolf on Tue May 12, 2009 8:44 pm

    nice


    _________________
    avatar
    _CsK_ImDrG_
    Elite
    Elite

    Posts : 1200
    Join date : 2008-11-04
    Age : 28
    Location : INDIA

    Re: Good post from CSA member when reviewing RTSL game Vs RoR

    Post by _CsK_ImDrG_ on Tue May 12, 2009 10:46 pm

    @wolfie

    i knw u never read that full..... lazy xD

    @topic

    i dont think wat he mentioned is 99% true... still i got to accept, coz im not better than the person who wrote that...


    _________________
    avatar
    CSA_J_Conner
    Paladin
    Paladin

    Posts : 893
    Join date : 2008-11-22

    Re: Good post from CSA member when reviewing RTSL game Vs RoR

    Post by CSA_J_Conner on Wed May 13, 2009 12:04 am

    i do think sometimes scout rushes and fwd archers work in 3v3, but not against good players who can scout and catch your fwd, scout rush is soo easy to defend against, 2 spears (Vs 4-5 scouts)will not delay castle time at all
    avatar
    daG
    Tarkan
    Tarkan

    Posts : 766
    Join date : 2008-12-31
    Age : 23

    Re: Good post from CSA member when reviewing RTSL game Vs RoR

    Post by daG on Wed May 13, 2009 12:46 am

    scratch nice one dude keep it up .. study your thoughts were good. read full .. true .. not kidding . truly read balb


    _________________
    11.29% of total / 3.25 posts per day
    avatar
    _CsK_ImDrG_
    Elite
    Elite

    Posts : 1200
    Join date : 2008-11-04
    Age : 28
    Location : INDIA

    Re: Good post from CSA member when reviewing RTSL game Vs RoR

    Post by _CsK_ImDrG_ on Wed May 13, 2009 10:00 am

    i remember games Vs Strom

    111111


    _________________
    avatar
    CSA_J_Conner
    Paladin
    Paladin

    Posts : 893
    Join date : 2008-11-22

    Re: Good post from CSA member when reviewing RTSL game Vs RoR

    Post by CSA_J_Conner on Wed May 13, 2009 10:03 am

    CsK_daG wrote:scratch nice one dude keep it up .. study your thoughts were good. read full .. true .. not kidding . truly read balb

    They are not my thoughts, you think i can type something that big?? it'll take me 2 days to finish @ my typing speed 1111
    avatar
    daG
    Tarkan
    Tarkan

    Posts : 766
    Join date : 2008-12-31
    Age : 23

    Re: Good post from CSA member when reviewing RTSL game Vs RoR

    Post by daG on Wed May 13, 2009 10:18 am

    ohh.. sorry .. good words of someone else Razz Razz


    _________________
    11.29% of total / 3.25 posts per day
    avatar
    CSK_Suhas
    Elite
    Elite

    Posts : 1781
    Join date : 2008-11-08
    Age : 28
    Location : mangalore , INDIA

    Re: Good post from CSA member when reviewing RTSL game Vs RoR

    Post by CSK_Suhas on Wed May 13, 2009 6:12 pm

    lol he told 1900- has bad start

    is it feel like a 16xx words for you XD


    _________________
    avatar
    CsK_kill3r
    Cavalier
    Cavalier

    Posts : 696
    Join date : 2008-11-04
    Age : 28
    Location : Mumbai

    Re: Good post from CSA member when reviewing RTSL game Vs RoR

    Post by CsK_kill3r on Wed May 13, 2009 7:11 pm

    CSK_Suhas wrote:lol he told 1900- has bad start


    kkab had said the same thing that 18-- players have bad build order (bad start)


    _________________


    avatar
    Raze2dust
    Mangudai
    Mangudai

    Posts : 545
    Join date : 2008-11-09
    Location : varies

    Re: Good post from CSA member when reviewing RTSL game Vs RoR

    Post by Raze2dust on Wed May 13, 2009 7:46 pm

    wtf scouts? isnt he talking about fc? 11

    yeah one stable is much better when playing with friends..used to go 1 stable in hamachi tgs..even if you make 2 stables you struggle to make 2nd tc, you struggle to keep stables working, and you struggle to get upgrades for the kts...without 2+1 armour kts are useless even vs archers
    avatar
    CSA_J_Conner
    Paladin
    Paladin

    Posts : 893
    Join date : 2008-11-22

    Re: Good post from CSA member when reviewing RTSL game Vs RoR

    Post by CSA_J_Conner on Wed May 13, 2009 8:15 pm

    http://www.rts-league.com/leagues/aoc/replays/

    there are 2 CSA Vs RoR games, the second one is what he is talking about, the older(first) game is gg.
    avatar
    CSK_Suhas
    Elite
    Elite

    Posts : 1781
    Join date : 2008-11-08
    Age : 28
    Location : mangalore , INDIA

    Re: Good post from CSA member when reviewing RTSL game Vs RoR

    Post by CSK_Suhas on Wed May 13, 2009 8:22 pm

    ya some noobs do paladin , but 14+4 & leaving armor as 2/3

    raped by arbalests & cav archers ...11


    _________________

    Sponsored content

    Re: Good post from CSA member when reviewing RTSL game Vs RoR

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sun Oct 22, 2017 12:43 am